|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0022885,
umls-concept:C0034065,
umls-concept:C0205265,
umls-concept:C0282440,
umls-concept:C0392366,
umls-concept:C0453882,
umls-concept:C0560738,
umls-concept:C0750491,
umls-concept:C1096777,
umls-concept:C1261322,
umls-concept:C1555582,
umls-concept:C1704656
|
|
pubmed:issue |
2
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-1-24
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We sought to determine whether using combinations of 3 bedside tests (7-variable clinical model, non-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test, and alveolar dead-space fraction) to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) before diagnostic imaging was as safe as a standard strategy of starting with ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-9926
|
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:BredesonChristopher NCN,
pubmed-author:BrunetteHeleneH,
pubmed-author:ClementAnne MarieAM,
pubmed-author:JonesGwynneG,
pubmed-author:KarovitchAlanA,
pubmed-author:MakropoulosDimitriD,
pubmed-author:NairRamaR,
pubmed-author:RasuliPasteurP,
pubmed-author:RaymondFrançoisF,
pubmed-author:ReardonMarkM,
pubmed-author:RodgerMarc AMA,
pubmed-author:StiellIanI,
pubmed-author:WellsPhilip SPS
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:day |
23
|
|
pubmed:volume |
166
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
181-7
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Biological Markers,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Point-of-Care Systems,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Predictive Value of Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Probability,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Pulmonary Embolism,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Reference Values,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Respiratory Dead Space,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Respiratory Function Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Risk Assessment,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Survival Rate,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Tomography, X-Ray Computed,
pubmed-meshheading:16432086-Ventilation-Perfusion Ratio
|
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The bedside investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis study: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing combinations of 3 bedside tests vs ventilation-perfusion scan for the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of Ottawa, Ottawa Health Research Institute, and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
