Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16412394
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-2-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
A distinguishing feature of SII cortex is that it receives substantial input from skin mechanoreceptors located on both sides of the body. It remains uncertain, however, if integration of bilateral inputs occurs mainly in those regions of SII that represent near-midline body regions or also occurs to a significant extent in those regions of SII that represent the distal extremities. This issue was addressed using extracellular microelectrode recordings in cat SII in combination with the method of optical intrinsic signal (OIS) imaging. Stimulation of the central pad of either the contra- or ipsilateral forepaw with a 25-Hz sinusoidal vertical skin displacement ("skin flutter") stimulus evoked a prominent OIS response ("activation") in an extensive anteroposterior sector of SII. In the anteriorly located SII region that yielded the maximal OIS response to stimulation of the contralateral central pad, neurons consistently possessed receptive fields that included the stimulated skin site. This "forepaw" SII region also exhibited significant although 75% weaker OIS activation in response to stimulation of the ipsilateral central pad. Stimulation of the central pads of either contra- or ipsilateral forepaws also evoked OIS activation in the posteriorly located 'hindlimb' region of SII--defined as the SII region comprised of neurons with receptive fields on the contralateral hindlimb. The OIS response to ipsilateral central pad stimulation was strongest in the posterior SII region that borders the suprasylvian fringe--a region in which neurons have very large, and frequently bilateral, cutaneous receptive fields. The results indicate that widespread regions within cat SII receive cutaneous inputs from the ipsilateral distal forelimb. It is suggested that the functional role of these ipsilateral inputs may be different in different SII regions.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0006-8993
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
3
|
pubmed:volume |
1071
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
81-90
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Action Potentials,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Brain Mapping,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Cats,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Diagnostic Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Electric Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Forelimb,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Functional Laterality,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Neurons,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:16412394-Somatosensory Cortex
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Activation of cat SII cortex by flutter stimulation of contralateral vs. ipsilateral forepaws.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7575, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|