Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1992-8-28
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In a prospective study the diagnostic value of MRI compared to CT arthrography (CT-A) was evaluated in 26 patients with 27 instable shoulder joints. Surgical and/or arthroscopic correlation was available in all cases. Both methods showed a high accuracy (96% CT-A, 94% MRI) in the evaluation of the glenoid labrum. CT-A was significantly superior to MRI in the detection of capsular lesions (sensitivity 96% vs. 44%, accuracy 96% vs. 72%, negative predictive value 96% vs. 67%). CT-A and MRI results regarding humeral head fractures were similar; fractures of the glenoid rim were better detected by CT-A, the difference, however, was statistically not significant. Overall, CT-A proved to be superior to MRI, as lesions of the joint capsule were shown with greater certainty.
|
pubmed:language |
ger
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
1438-9029
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
157
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
37-42
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Joint Instability,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Shoulder Fractures,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Shoulder Joint,
pubmed-meshheading:1638003-Tomography, X-Ray Computed
|
pubmed:year |
1992
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[MR tomography versus CT arthrography in glenohumeral instabilities].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Klinik mit Poliklinik für Radiologie, Universität Mainz.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|