Linked Life Data

16373168

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16373168

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-12-23
pubmed:abstractText
We continue to increase the amount of evaluations to improve the outcomes of our residency programs. Although ongoing faculty evaluations clearly are an important part of faculty development, their value in terms of improving the program needs to be evaluated. The questions asked were as follows: (1) Do faculty evaluations continue to improve the faculty over the course of successive evaluation periods? (2) Are there groups of faculty who would benefit the most from faculty evaluation feedback? (3) Are there any specific objective categories within the evaluation that carry more value and may help to shorten this form?
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0149-7944
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
63
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
80-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Ongoing faculty evaluations: developmental gain or just more pain?
pubmed:affiliation
University of Illinois Metropolitan Group Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois 60657, USA. vijay.maker-md@advocatehealth.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article