16372839

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16372839

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0010341, umls-concept:C0205189, umls-concept:C0871261, umls-concept:C1704632, umls-concept:C1706817, umls-concept:C1880266, umls-concept:C2911692
pubmed:issue	3
pubmed:dateCreated	2005-12-23
pubmed:abstractText	Collapsing DSM-III schizotypal and borderline groups to form a borderline population is unwarranted when the results are then related to borderline personality organization. In a comparison of overlapping scoring systems for inferring defensive operations, Lerner, Albert, and Walsh intertwine fact and theory extravagantly and are not justified by their chosen populations nor their assumptions about the theories involved.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/1260201
pubmed:status	PubMed-not-MEDLINE
pubmed:issn	0022-3891
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:CarrA CAC
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	51
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	349-54
pubmed:year	1987
pubmed:articleTitle	Borderline defenses and Rorschach responses: a critique of Lerner, Albert, and Walsh.
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University Medical College, Westchester Division, The New York Hospital, White Plains 10605, USA.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article