Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16372669
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-12-23
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Some patients require conversion to open surgery and several preoperative variables have been identified as risk factors that are helpful in predicting the probability of conversion. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that make LC difficult and determine conversion to open approach: Our study includes: 6985 cases which underwent LC and 1430 cases with open cholecystectomy, between March 1993 and April 2005 in our clinic of general surgery. The overall conversion rate was 5.1% (deliberate conversion--299 cases, conversion of necessity--62 cases). The conversion rate has decreased from 17.5% in 1993 to 3.2% in recent years. The most conversion happen after a simple inspection or a minimal dissection caused by the existence of perforation (105 cases), the discovery of a difficult anatomic situation (63 cases) or of another pathology (14 cases); more rarely, the conversion was necessary in the principal time, doing to hemorrhage (26 cases), impossible dissection (41 cases), visceral injury (1 case) or even at the end of the operation, doing to hemorrhage, loss piece or stone (10 cases), and other situations (101 cases). Significant predictors of conversion were acute cholecystitis , choledocholithiasis, past history of acute cholecystitis, male gender, gall bladder wall thickness exceeding 6 mm. In conclusion, based on our experience, we suggest limiting OC to patients with proven contraindications to LC (i.e., Mirizzi syndrome or systemic illness incompatible with general anesthesia or pneumoperitoneum), attempting LC in all other cases. Decision to convert to open approach is a proven of surgical maturity. Conversion must be decided from the beginning, in the moment of the recognition of a difficult situation and not after the occurrence of a complication.
|
pubmed:language |
rum
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1221-9118
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
100
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
437-44
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Cholecystectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Cholelithiasis,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Risk Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:16372669-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Centrul de Cercetare in Chirurgie General? Clasic? si Laparoscopic?, Clinica I Chirurgie "II T?n?sescu-VI. Bu?ureanu", Universitatea de Medicin? si Farmacie "Gr. T. Popa" Ia?i. etarco@iasi.mednet.ro
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
English Abstract
|