Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16362360
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
7
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-7-4
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Mobile and fixed bearing in total knee replacement are still discussed controversially. In a retrospective, matched-pair study, we investigated 40 patients with computer-assisted (BrainLAB) primary total knee replacement (PFC Sigma, DePuy) performed two years before. Twenty patients each received a mobile bearing and a fixed bearing. We compared Womac Score, Knee Society Score, postoperative ROM, fluoroscopic measurement of knee stability in flexion and extension and isokinetic muscle strength using a Biodex-3 dynamometer. Both groups showed similar results concerning WOMAC Score (total rotating bearing: 23.05; fixed bearing: 22.57), KSS (rotating bearing: 174.89; fixed bearing: 176.1). Isokinetic muscle force demonstrated statistically significant superior results for knee flexion in the rotating bearing group. Medio-lateral stability revealed statistically significant superior results for the rotating bearing compared to fixed bearing in extension (P>0.05). In flexion only lateral stability was superior (P>0.05). Two-year clinical follow-up after computer-assisted total knee replacement resulted in good clinical outcome with high patient satisfaction. Statistically significant better values for the rotating platform group were found for the medio-lateral stability in extension and the peak flexion torque.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jul
|
| pubmed:issn |
0942-2056
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
14
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
605-11
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Biomechanics,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Fluoroscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Joint Instability,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Knee Joint,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Knee Prosthesis,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Matched-Pair Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Muscle Strength,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Muscle Strength Dynamometer,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Patient Satisfaction,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Prosthesis Design,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Range of Motion, Articular,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Surgery, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:16362360-Treatment Outcome
|
| pubmed:year |
2006
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V. Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany. c_luering@yahoo.de
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|