Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16352022
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-12-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare tumour. Current imaging techniques (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI; computed axial tomography, CAT; 2-D echocardiography), although useful in delineating the extent of tumour involvement, do not correlate well with intraoperative findings of resectability. We report a case were palliative surgical resection was technically possible, contrary to expectations from CAT and MRI findings. However, the patient was clinically in extremis, with advanced ventricular dysfunction, and died. Despite the short-term risk involved in surgery, if palliative resection is possible, a multidisciplinary approach with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation can result in mid-term survival.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:status |
PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1443-9506
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
10
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
30-4
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-1-19
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Cardiac angiosarcoma: too little known, too late treatment or just too bad a tumour?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. John.Alvarez@health.wa.gov.au
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|