Linked Life Data

16281469

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16281469

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5-6
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-11-11
pubmed:abstractText
Despite its shortcomings, peer review is still the best tool of scientific publishing. It brings benefits not only to the journal and its authors, but to the peer reviewers: they are privileged to have an insight into the latest research and still unpublished results in their scientific field. Reviewers also build up their ability to critically assess scientific papers, which may be useful in their own professional work and development. We wrote these brief guidelines to help Croatian-speaking physicians to satisfactorily respond in case they receive a scientific journal editor's request for a manuscript review. The guidelines were created primarily for new reviewers, but they may be useful as a refresher text for experienced reviewers.
pubmed:language
hrv
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0024-3477
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
127
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
107-11
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
[Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
pubmed:affiliation
Croatian Medical Journal, Medicinski fakultet Sveucilista u Zagrebu, Zagreb.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract