16277232

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16277232

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0282443, umls-concept:C0600659, umls-concept:C1515023, umls-concept:C1552617
pubmed:issue	10
pubmed:dateCreated	2005-11-9
pubmed:abstractText	Using some examples, the author describes how to review English-written manuscripts submitted to peer-review journals. One of the most important responsibilities for reviewers is to return the comments to the editor before deadline. Reviewers should not only criticize but also attempt to improve manuscripts. Participation in journal review may facilitate critical thoughts on their own manuscript writing.
pubmed:language	jpn
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/0413550
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Oct
pubmed:issn	0006-8969
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:AsanoEishiE
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	57
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	877-81
pubmed:dateRevised	2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:16277232-Language, pubmed-meshheading:16277232-Manuscripts, Medical, pubmed-meshheading:16277232-Peer Review, pubmed-meshheading:16277232-Periodicals as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:16277232-Publishing
pubmed:year	2005
pubmed:articleTitle	[How to review English-written manuscripts submitted to peer-review journals].
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, English Abstract, Review