|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-11-14
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
For parsimony analyses, the most common way to estimate confidence is by resampling plans (nonparametric bootstrap, jackknife), and Bremer support (Decay indices). The recent literature reveals that parameter settings that are quite commonly employed are not those that are recommended by theoretical considerations and by previous empirical studies. The optimal search strategy to be applied during resampling was previously addressed solely via standard search strategies available in PAUP*. The question of a compromise between search extensiveness and improved support accuracy for Bremer support received even less attention. A set of experiments was conducted on different datasets to find an empirical cut-off point at which increased search extensiveness does not significantly change Bremer support and jackknife or bootstrap proportions any more.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-10942606,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12064229,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12064242,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12079646,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12116433,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12116478,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12116479,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12116944,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-12742757,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-1435238,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-15062810,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-15248131,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-1560769,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-7620635,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-7991621,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-8354601,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16255783-8917608
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1471-2148
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:volume |
5
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
58
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Bayes Theorem,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Biological Evolution,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Computer Simulation,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Confidence Intervals,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-DNA, Concatenated,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-DNA, Ribosomal,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Data Interpretation, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Models, Genetic,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Models, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Models, Theoretical,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Phylogeny,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Probability,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Programming Languages,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-RNA, Ribosomal, 18S,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Sequence Analysis, DNA,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Software,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Statistics, Nonparametric,
pubmed-meshheading:16255783-Statistics as Topic
|
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, Bonn, D-53115, Germany. kaimueller@uni-bonn.de
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|
