Linked Life Data

16187771

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16187771

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-9-28
pubmed:abstractText
We recently derived a cutoff on a self-report scale corresponding to the most commonly used definition of remission in depression treatment studies (i.e., Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score < or = 7). However, recent research has suggested that use of this cutoff on the HAM-D to define remission is overinclusive. The goal of the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project was to examine how many depressed patients in ongoing treatment who are considered to be in remission by a self-report equivalent of the HAM-D definition of remission nonetheless do not consider themselves to be in remission.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0160-6689
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
66
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1134-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Differences between minimally depressed patients who do and do not consider themselves to be in remission.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02905, USA. mzimmerman@lifespan.org
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study