Linked Life Data

16187467

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16187467

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-9-27
pubmed:abstractText
Although a moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level is widely recommended, it is unknown whether moderate PEEP during mechanical ventilation has adverse effects during severe hemorrhagic shock. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of 0 cm H2O PEEP versus 5 cm H2O PEEP versus 10 cm H2O PEEP on short-term survival in a porcine model of severe hemorrhagic shock. Secondary study endpoints were hemodynamic variables and blood gases.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1097-6760
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
46
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
337-42
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation on survival during severe hemorrhagic shock.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. anette.krismer@uibk.ac.at
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't