Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16183238
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0010186,
umls-concept:C0024671,
umls-concept:C0025664,
umls-concept:C0086296,
umls-concept:C0205210,
umls-concept:C0220812,
umls-concept:C0220825,
umls-concept:C0430054,
umls-concept:C0439858,
umls-concept:C0443199,
umls-concept:C0542559,
umls-concept:C1521738,
umls-concept:C1704608,
umls-concept:C1705053,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C1883674
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-1-17
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The use of full field digital mammography (FFDM) in alternative to conventional screen film mammography (SFM) in the current practice is delayed by the high costs of FFDM. The present study, performed at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica of Florence, using both FFDM and SFM, was aimed at estimating the impact of introducing the new FFDM technique on overall mammography costs.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0720-048X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
57
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
69-75
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica, Viale A, Volta 171, Florence, Italy. s.ciatto@cspo.it
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|