Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16179635
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
10
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-9-23
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0278-4297
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
24
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1461; author reply 1461-2
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Cervix Uteri,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Labor, Induced,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Predictive Value of Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Pregnancy Trimester, Third,
pubmed-meshheading:16179635-Ultrasonography, Doppler
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Is sonographic cervical length meaningful for the prediction of successful induction of labor?
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Letter,
Comment
|