Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-9-7
pubmed:abstractText
We analyzed a shell vial culture assay (SVA), real-time PCR, and a direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) for rapid detection of vaccinia virus from vaccination sites of Dryvax vaccine recipients. Of 47 samples assayed, 100% were positive by PCR, 89% were positive by SVA, and 40% were positive by DFA. DFA was limited by the need for adequate numbers of cells, with 32% of samples inadequate for interpretation. DFA performed better with specimens from patients who had not previously received the vaccine. PCR was positive for longer times postvaccination than was SVA. Infectious virus could be recovered after 45 min of acetone fixation of shell vial coverslips. Commercially available polyclonal antibodies cross-reacted with other orthopoxviruses and herpes simplex 1, but commercially available monoclonal antibodies were specific for vaccinia virus. In summary, PCR was the most sensitive test for detecting vaccinia virus in clinical specimens, while the DFA was the most rapid but the least sensitive test.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-11015421, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-11825961, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-12037052, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-12603846, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-12781015, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-12856217, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-12916394, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-14172233, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-14727224, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-14765347, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-14766823, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-14962785, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-14962998, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-15004077, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-15004124, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-15013881, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-184207, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-21318, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-4300247, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-4381041, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-61622, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16145113-9230407
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
43
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
4602-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of methods for detection of vaccinia virus in patient specimens.
pubmed:affiliation
Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1508, USA. dfedorko@nih.gov
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies