Linked Life Data

16121650

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16121650

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-8-26
pubmed:abstractText
The value of instruments for the evaluation of health- or patient information is a controversial issue. This article examines instruments that evaluate information materials on the basis of predefined quality criteria for evidence-based patient information. The aim is to prove whether the instruments commonly used in Germany can be recommended. A review of the literature and an internet search engine search were conducted to identify relevant international systematic reviews and instruments commonly used in Germany. Four instruments were identified for Germany: The quality seals "AFGIS" and "HON" and the checklists "Discern" and "Check-In". These were evaluated on the basis of the predefined criteria. The instruments predominantly address structural aspects. Aspects of content and content presentation are rarely considered. The instruments neglect relevant quality criteria for evidence-based patient information.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1431-7621
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
99
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
353-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-3
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
[Evaluation tools for patient information commonly used in Germany--a critical analysis].
pubmed:affiliation
Universität Hamburg, Fachwissenschaft Gesundheit. sascha.koepke@uni-hamburg.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract