16047016

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16047016

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0085263, umls-concept:C0400997, umls-concept:C0522776
pubmed:issue	2
pubmed:dateCreated	2005-7-27
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16047016-15729238
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/0010505
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Aug
pubmed:issn	0016-5107
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:NelsonDouglas BDB, pubmed-author:SawhneyMandeep SMS
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	62
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	329-30; author reply 330
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:16047016-Bile, pubmed-meshheading:16047016-Bile Ducts, pubmed-meshheading:16047016-Cholecystectomy, pubmed-meshheading:16047016-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:16047016-Postoperative Complications, pubmed-meshheading:16047016-Stents
pubmed:year	2005
pubmed:articleTitle	Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs. stent placement for postcholecystectomy bile leak.
pubmed:publicationType	Letter, Comparative Study, Comment