Linked Life Data

1602393

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1602393

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-7-14
pubmed:abstractText
This study evaluated the discriminative stimulus effects of caffeine in humans. Nine normal male and female volunteers (ages 18-28) were trained to discriminate between the methylxanthine central nervous system stimulant caffeine (320 mg/70 kg, p.o.) and placebo. Monetary reinforcers were earned for identifying correctly the letter code associated with each substance. After four training sessions, the ability to discriminate between the two training conditions was tested for 20 sessions (test-of-acquisition). In subjects who met the criterion for discrimination (i.e., greater than or equal to 85% correct responding on greater than or equal to 4 consecutive sessions during the last 10 test-of-acquisition sessions) dose-effect curves for caffeine (0, 56, 100, 180, 240 and 320 mg/70 kg) and for the benzodiazepine triazolam (0, 0.10, 0.32 and 0.56 mg/70 kg) were determined. Seven of the nine subjects learned the caffeine-placebo discrimination and their performance improved across the 20 test-of-acquisition sessions. The training dose of caffeine (320 mg/70 kg) produced stimulant-like self-reports that differed from placebo when the letter codes were identified correctly, but not when the letter codes were identified incorrectly. Novel caffeine doses produced dose-related increases in caffeine-appropriate responding (N = 4), whereas triazolam produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding (N = 3) and self-reports that differed from both caffeine and placebo. Throughout dose-effect curve determinations, the training dose of caffeine and placebo continued to be identified correctly (range: 84-100% correct responding). These results suggest that a caffeine (320 mg/70 kg)-placebo discrimination 1) can be acquired and maintained, 2) is related to self-reported drug effects if the training conditions are correctly identified and 3) has some pharmacological specificity.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0022-3565
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
261
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
885-94
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Caffeine drug discrimination in humans: acquisition, specificity and correlation with self-reports.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.