Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15992596
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
7
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-7-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Exposure measurements of concentrations that are non-detectable or near the detection limit (DL) are common in environmental research. Proper statistical treatment of non-detects is critical to avoid bias and unnecessary loss of information. In the present work, we present an overview of possible statistical strategies for handling non-detectable values, including deletion, simple substitution, distributional methods, and distribution-based imputation. Simple substitution methods (e.g., substituting 0, DL/2, DL/ radical2, or DL for the non-detects) are the most commonly applied, even though the EPA Guidance for Data Quality Assessment discouraged their use when the percentage of non-detects is >15%. Distribution-based multiple imputation methods, also known as robust or "fill-in" procedures, may produce dependable results even when 50-70% of the observations are non-detects and can be performed using commonly available statistical software. Any statistical analysis can be conducted on the imputed datasets. Results properly reflect the presence of non-detectable values and produce valid statistical inference. We describe the use of distribution-based multiple imputation in a recent investigation conducted on subjects from the Seveso population exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), in which 55.6% of plasma TCDD measurements were non-detects. We suggest that distribution-based multiple imputation be the preferred method to analyze environmental data when substantial proportions of observations are non-detects.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0045-6535
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
60
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
898-906
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-19
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Acne Vulgaris,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Chemistry Techniques, Analytical,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Data Interpretation, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Environmental Monitoring,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Italy,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Linear Models,
pubmed-meshheading:15992596-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Handling of dioxin measurement data in the presence of non-detectable values: overview of available methods and their application in the Seveso chloracne study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA. andrea.baccarelli@unimi.it
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|