Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-6-24
pubmed:abstractText
Every researcher who conducts research involving human subjects for their data has experiences with one or more institutional review boards. Some view their institutional review board experiences as helpful; others view them as painful and obstructive. However, there are many misperceptions about institutional review boards and their operation. Some common misperceptions are presented and discussed in an effort to correct false views held by researchers.
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0894-3184
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
18
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
264-70
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-10-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
pubmed:affiliation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article