Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-6-15
pubmed:abstractText
The performances of the BDProbeTec ET (Becton Dickinson) and COBAS AMPLICOR MTB (Roche) were retrospectively evaluated for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in various respiratory specimens. The BACTEC and MGIT liquid culture system (Becton Dickinson) was used as a reference method. A total of 824 respiratory specimens, comprised of sputa, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and bronchial and tracheal aspirates from 580 patients, were evaluated. Out of 824 clinical specimens, 109 specimens from 43 patients were culture positive for M. tuberculosis. Of these 109 specimens, 67 were smear positive, 85 were positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, and 94 were positive by the BDProbeTec ET. Of the 715 culture-negative specimens, 17 were positive by the auramine staining, 11 were positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, and 12 were positive by the BDProbeTec ET. After discrepancy analysis and review of the patients' clinical data, 130 specimens from 50 patients were considered "true-positive" specimens. This resulted in the following sensitivities: microscopy, 61.5%; COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, 78.0%; and BDProbeTec ET, 86.2%. The specificities of each system, based on the clinical diagnosis, were 99.7% for microscopy, 99.9% for the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, and 99.9% for the BDProbeTec ET. The data presented represent a considerable number of specimens evaluated with a considerable number of culture- and auramine-positive and culture-positive and auramine-negative results and therefore give a realistic view of how the data should be interpreted in a daily routine situation. Specifically, the data with regard to the culture-positive and auramine-negative specimens are useful, because in a routine situation, auramine-negative specimens are sometimes accepted, on clinical indications, to be analyzed by an amplification method.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-10517722, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-10523560, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-10655400, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-10747143, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-10764337, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-11412911, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-11739129, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-12111602, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-12435071, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-12682186, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-12750957, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-14662911, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-15135494, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-2177747, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8041630, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8264674, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8603974, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8727880, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8748289, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8815093, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-8815097, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-9154896, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-9399498, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-9738032, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15956364-9817880
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
43
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2563-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB and BDProbeTec ET assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens.
pubmed:affiliation
Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.goessens@erasmusmc.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies