Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15935311
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-6-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In summary, MR imaging is superior to other imaging modalities, including CT, for the work-up of liver masses. The current challenge is whether the superior performance of MR imaging translates into a beneficial effect on patient management, disease outcome, and health care costs. New MR sequences, phased-array surface coils, and tissue-specific MR contrast agents suggest that MR imaging may exceed further the diagnostic ability of CT.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
1064-9689
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
13
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
255-75
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2005-11-16
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Contrast Media,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Diagnosis, Differential,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Image Enhancement,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Liver Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Liver Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Prognosis,
pubmed-meshheading:15935311-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Liver masses.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Section of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.hussain@erasmusmc.nl
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|