Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-6-29
pubmed:abstractText
This study examines drill guide length and drilling method to see which technique produces the most accurate hole diameter. Two hundred twenty-five holes were produced in fresh porcine mandibles and then measured with a micrometer. A long guide, a short guide, and no guide were used with a drill press, a pneumatic drill, and a manual drill. Using a 2-mm drill bit, the overall average diameter was 2.03 mm and the overall range was 1.85 mm to 2.60 mm. Statistical analysis of the data indicates the drilling method and the guide length made no difference in the hole diameter at the 95% level (P = .05).
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0278-2391
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
50
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
613-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Bone hole diameter as a function of drill guide length and drilling method in rigid internal fixation.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, St Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't