Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15890159
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-5-13
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Threshold (Th) is a neurophysiological parameter frequently used in TMS studies. The present study was designed to investigate the repeatability of the Th measurements by reexamining healthy subjects over various time points. Overall, 82 subjects (median age: 19 years, range: 12-65) entered the study. Following a baseline examination, there were six retest sessions: S0 (n = 8 hemispheres reexamined, mean interval x = 19 min), S1 (n = 34 hemispheres reexamined, mean interval x = 4 days), S2 (n = 32 hemispheres, x = 29 days), S3 (n = 30 hemispheres, x = 106 days), S4 (n = 30 hemispheres, x = 183 days) and S5 (n = 30 hemispheres, x = 1867 days). Stimulation was performed with a figure of eight coil and Th was defined at 1% steps. At baseline, controls had an MT of 41.1 +/- 8. Mean difference of MT from baseline was 0.62 on S0 (95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference: -1.04 to +2.29), 0.13 on S1 (95% CI: -1.2 to +1.5), -0.03 on S2 (95% CI: -1.1 to +1.06), -2.07 on S3 (95% CI: -4.33 to +0.19), 0.15 on S4 (95% CI: -0.98 to +1.28) and 0.87 on S5 (95% CI: -0.49 to +2.23). None of these differences were statistically significant (repeated measures ANOVA, P > 0.05). The upper limit of MT difference that an individual subject might have with a probability of 95% (measurement error) was 8. The repeatability of the method was found to be independent from the age of the subjects, the magnitude of threshold or the test-retest interval. The topography of corticomotor threshold was also investigated. Minimal threshold values were obtained from a restricted area of scalp sites that always included the fixed stimulation point of the current protocol. Therefore, using a fixed stimulation point is an adequate technique for measuring threshold. In conclusion, threshold is a stable parameter on an individual and group basis. These data quantify the repeatability of the method and may prove useful in the interpretation of findings during longitudinal studies.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0987-7053
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
34
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
259-66
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Electromyography,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Hand,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Magnetics,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Motor Cortex,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Muscle Relaxation,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Neurophysiology,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Reference Values,
pubmed-meshheading:15890159-Reproducibility of Results
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The repeatability of corticomotor threshold measurements.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Neurology III, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Papanikolaou Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece. kimiskid@med.auth.gr
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Validation Studies
|