Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15880287
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-8-31
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The ongoing debate about the relative merits of endoscopic (EH) vs open mesh herniorrhaphy (OH) prompts the need for comparisons of outcome measures other than recurrence. Therefore, we reviewed data on the costs, time to return to work, quality of life (QoL), and pain associated with EH and OH.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
1432-2218
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
19
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
816-21
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: a review.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. mgholghesaei@hotmail.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Review
|