Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15855435
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
16
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-4-27
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The clinical validity of using computed tomography (CT) to diagnose peripheral pulmonary embolism is uncertain. Insufficient sensitivity for peripheral pulmonary embolism is considered the principal limitation of CT.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
1538-3598
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
27
|
pubmed:volume |
293
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
2012-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-7
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Meta-Analysis
|