Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15829998
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
7
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-6-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) has issued guidelines for the detection and treatment of hypertension. According to these guidelines, normal 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) is defined as lower than 125/80 mmHg. Another publication of ESH recommendations for blood pressure (BP) measurement defines normal awake and asleep blood pressure as lower than 135/85 and 120/70 mmHg, respectively. Our aim was to investigate the compatibility of these two recently proposed ABP cutoffs in clinical practice. We analysed 1495 consecutive ABP measurements. In all, 56% of the subjects were female; age 58 +/- 16 years; body mass index 27 +/- 4 kg/m(2); clinic BP 151+/-22/84 +/- 13 mmHg. Two-thirds were treated for hypertension, and 11% for diabetes. Subjects were classified as having normal 24-h BP if the corresponding value was <125/80 mmHg. Normal awake-sleep BP was diagnosed if awake BP was <135/85 mmHg and sleep BP was <120/70 mmHg. Concordance between the cutoffs was found in 93% of the subjects. Among the 7% discordant subjects, 4.5% were hypertensive applying the 24 h, but not awake-sleep, BP values, whereas only 2.5% were hypertensive according to awake-sleep, but not 24 h, BP values (P < 0.005). In Conclusion, in real-life ABP measurement, a good agreement was found between two recently issued ABP normality definitions. However, some subjects are classified as hypertensive only according to one of these methods, more often by the 24-h cutoff of 125/80. This discordance may be significant in large-scale clinical BP monitoring.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0950-9240
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
19
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
565-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Blood Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Blood Pressure Monitors,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Circadian Rhythm,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Hypertension,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Practice Guidelines as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:15829998-Reproducibility of Results
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Normal ambulatory blood pressure: a clinical practice-based comparison of two recently published definitions.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Internal Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. vp02292@netvision.net.il
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|