Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-4-13
pubmed:abstractText
The effects of grain adaptation protocol on subacute acidosis and feed intake by cattle were studied in a completely randomized experiment using 12 crossbred heifers (384 +/- 25 kg BW). The dietary proportion of concentrate was increased from 40 to 90% (DM basis) either by rapid adaptation (65% concentrate diet fed for 3 d) or by gradual adaptation (five intermediate diets containing 48.3, 56.7, 65.0, 73.3, and 81.7% concentrate, fed for 3 d each). Feed intake and ruminal pH (by indwelling ruminal electrodes) were monitored over 20 d. Mean daily pH variables did not differ (P > or = 0.10) between treatments on any of the 3 or 4 d that 65 or 90% concentrate was fed. Variances of a number of pH variables were greater (P < 0.05) for rapidly adapted heifers than for those on the gradual adaptation protocol during adaptation to 65 and 90% concentrate. Mean hourly pH did not differ over the first 24 h of adaptation to 65% concentrate, but variance of hourly pH tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for rapidly adapted than for gradually adapted heifers for eight of the first 24 h. On the first day of feeding 90% concentrate, ruminal pH tended (P = 0.07) to be less at 11 and 12 h after feeding with rapid adaptation than with gradual adaptation. Variance of hourly pH increased steadily in rapidly adapted heifers from 6 h after feeding onward. Ruminal VFA concentration and osmolality did not differ between treatments. Ruminal lactate concentration was < 1 mM, except in two rapidly adapted heifers and one gradually adapted heifer after introduction to 90% concentrate. Adaptation method did not affect DMI or day-to-day variation in DMI. Detection of acidosis was associated with increased variance in ruminal pH variables. A range of individual responses to grain challenge was observed, but current management strategies for preventing acidosis in pens of cattle are based on responses of the most susceptible individuals. A better understanding of factors governing individual responses to acidotic challenge may allow for the development of more effective acidosis prevention practices.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
1525-3163
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
83
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1116-32
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Acidosis, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Adaptation, Physiological, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Animal Feed, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Animal Husbandry, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Animals, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Area Under Curve, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Blood Chemical Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Blood Glucose, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Carbon Dioxide, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Cattle, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Cattle Diseases, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Eating, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Fatty Acids, Volatile, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Female, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Fermentation, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Food, Formulated, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Hematocrit, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Random Allocation, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Rumen, pubmed-meshheading:15827257-Time Factors
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle.
pubmed:affiliation
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't