15823080

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15823080

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0025663, umls-concept:C0741968, umls-concept:C0806140, umls-concept:C1545588, umls-concept:C2348535
pubmed:issue	2
pubmed:dateCreated	2005-4-12
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15823080-15823062
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/100896915
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Apr
pubmed:issn	1526-6028
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:ParodiJuan CJC
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	12
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	166-8; discussion 168-70
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Angioplasty, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Carotid Arteries, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Carotid Stenosis, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Equipment Design, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Intracranial Embolism, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Regional Blood Flow, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Stents, pubmed-meshheading:15823080-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year	2005
pubmed:articleTitle	Is flow reversal the best method of protection during carotid stenting?
pubmed:affiliation	Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. parodij@wustl.edu
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comment