Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-7-21
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to compare CT, MRI and FDG-PET in the prediction of outcome of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer. A total of 23 patients with T3/4 rectal cancer underwent a preoperative radiochemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia. Staging was performed using four-slice CT (n=23), 1.5-T MRI (n=10), and (18)F-FDG-PET (n=23) before and 2-4 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant treatment. Response criteria were a change in T category and tumour volume for CT and MRI and a change in glucose uptake (standard uptake value) within the tumour for FDG-PET. Imaging results were compared with those of pretherapy endorectal ultrasound and histopathological findings. Histopathology showed a response to neoadjuvant therapy in 13 patients whereas 10 patients were classified as nonresponders. The mean SUV reduction in responders (60+/-14%) was significantly higher than in nonresponders (37+/-31%; P=0.030). The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET in identifying response was 100% (CT 54%, MRI 71%) and 60% (CT 80%, MRT 67%). Positive and negative predictive values were 77% (CT 78%, MRI 83%) and 100% (CT 57%, MRI 50%) (PET P=0.002, CT P=0.197, MRI P=0.500). These results suggest that FDG-PET is superior to CT and MRI in predicting response to preoperative multimodal treatment of locally advanced primary rectal cancer.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0938-7994
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
15
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1658-66
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Adenocarcinoma, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Female, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Magnetic Resonance Imaging, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Male, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Neoadjuvant Therapy, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Neoplasm Staging, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Positron-Emission Tomography, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Predictive Value of Tests, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Preoperative Care, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Radiopharmaceuticals, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Rectal Neoplasms, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Rectum, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Sensitivity and Specificity, pubmed-meshheading:15806369-Tomography, X-Ray Computed
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of CT, MRI and FDG-PET in response prediction of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal preoperative therapy: is there a benefit in using functional imaging?
pubmed:affiliation
Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde und PET-Zentrum Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany. timm.denecke@charite.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Clinical Trial, Phase III