rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-3-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The larger size of the first sacral nerve root has been reported to be an unfavorable factor leading to sacral sparing in epidural anesthesia. Previous studies have shown that an adequate analgesic effect of the epidural block was achieved with the catheter placement in the caudal direction. In this study, the anesthetic effect of epidural anesthesia with catheter placement of a cephalic or caudad direction was compared in ankle and hemorrhoid surgery.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
0001-5172
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
49
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
406-10
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Anesthesia, Caudal,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Anesthesia, Epidural,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Anesthesia Recovery Period,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Ankle,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Catheterization,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Hemorrhoids,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Statistics, Nonparametric,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:15752410-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Anesthetic effect of epidural anesthesia with cephalad or caudad catheterization for ankle surgery or hemorrhoidectomy.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Anesthesia, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|