rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-2-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
[corrected] To determine whether routine electronic records are an accurate source of population health data in general practice through reviewing cervical smears rates in four South Australian practices.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
1326-0200
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
28
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
317-20
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-7-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Family Practice,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Health Status Indicators,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Medical Records Systems, Computerized,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-South Australia,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Uterine Cervical Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:15704693-Vaginal Smears
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Electronic medical records may be inadequate for improving population health status through general practice: cervical smears as a case study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of General Practice, University of Adelaide, South Australia. caroline.laurence@adelaide.edu.au
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|