Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-1-10
pubmed:abstractText
To compare the findings of renal ultrasonography (US) in the evaluation of patients with and with no haematuria. The increased use of cross-sectional imaging and US has led to a dramatic improvement in the diagnosis of renal masses, such that computed tomography and/or US have been integrated into the diagnostic evaluation of haematuria, and many more incidental renal lesions are now detected. Thus it is possible that the lesions identified during evaluation for haematuria are incidental, i.e. identified serendipitously, and unrelated to the haematuria.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
1464-4096
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
95
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
64-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-7-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Parenchymal imaging adds diagnostic utility in evaluating haematuria.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Urology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4960 Children's Place Campus, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Evaluation Studies