Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2005-1-7
pubmed:abstractText
No long-term (>3 years) prospective comparison of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALLTx) to adult deceased donor liver transplantation (ADDLTx) has been reported. This is a prospective, IRB approved, 6-year comparison of A2ALLTx to ADDLTx. Data include: age, gender, ethnicity, primary liver disease, waiting time, pretransplant CTP/MELD score, cold ischemia time (CIT), perioperative mortality, acute and chronic rejection, graft and patient survival, charges and post-transplant complications. In 6 years, 202 ADDLTx (74.5%) and 69 A2ALLTx (25.5%) were performed at VCUHS. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was the most common reason for transplantation in both groups (48.1% vs. 42%). Data regarding overall patient and graft survival, monetary charges and retransplantation rates were similar. Comparison of patient/graft survivals, retransplantation rates in patients with and without HCV were not statistically different. A2ALLTx patients had less acute rejection (11.5% vs. 23.9%) and more biliary complications (26.1% vs. 11.4%). Overall, A2ALLTx is as durable a liver replacement technique as the ADDLTx. Patients with A2ALLTx were younger, had lower MELD scores, less acute rejection and similar histological HCV recurrence. Biliary complications were more common in A2ALLTx but were not associated with increased graft loss compared to ADDLTx.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
1600-6135
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
5
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
149-56
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Biopsy, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Cadaver, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Cold Temperature, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Female, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Graft Survival, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Hepacivirus, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Hepatitis C, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Immunosuppressive Agents, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Ischemia, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Liver, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Liver Diseases, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Liver Failure, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Liver Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Living Donors, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Male, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Proportional Hazards Models, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Recurrence, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Tissue Donors, pubmed-meshheading:15636624-Tissue and Organ Procurement
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 6-year single center experience.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmon, VA, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study