Linked Life Data

15617540

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15617540

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-12-24
pubmed:abstractText
The physician-patient relationship was governed for centuries by the ethical principle of beneficence and the physician's dedication to the principle of doing no harm. This structure shifted, however, to the principle of personal autonomy as medical and surgical knowledge expanded and patients, rather than physicians, became the locus of decision-making authority. In biomedical research in the United States, however, beneficence of the research professional remained dominant until a spectrum of doubtful research practices was made public in the 1970s and thereafter. Over the past three decades, state and federal governments have instituted regulations that provide increased protections for human research subjects, although research results are rarely shared with subjects because of the provisional nature of unconfirmed laboratory results. Now, however, genetics researchers and others suggest that subjects may well have an interest in present and future results, even though provisional. These issues are presently under discussion and may eventually open new possibilities for sharing research information with subjects who wish to be informed.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0009-9163
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
67
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2005-11-16
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
Research in human genetics: the tension between doing no harm and personal autonomy.
pubmed:affiliation
GenELSI Consulting, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA. mkzp@att.net
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Historical Article