15612905

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15612905

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0013631, umls-concept:C0030768, umls-concept:C0030971, umls-concept:C1522240, umls-concept:C1709941, umls-concept:C1882950
pubmed:issue	1
pubmed:dateCreated	2004-12-22
pubmed:abstractText	To explore the review process from the reviewers' perspective, including perceptions of the time taken to carry out a review, barriers to and facilitators of the review process, benefits of reviewing, opinions about blinded versus transparent reviews, how the process of reviewing might be made easier, and to assess reviewers' experience of, and training in, the peer review process.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/7605655
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Jan
pubmed:issn	0308-0110
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:SnellLindaL, pubmed-author:SpencerJohnJ
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	39
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	90-7
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:15612905-Education, Medical, Undergraduate, pubmed-meshheading:15612905-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15612905-Peer Review, pubmed-meshheading:15612905-Publishing, pubmed-meshheading:15612905-Quality Control, pubmed-meshheading:15612905-Questionnaires
pubmed:year	2005
pubmed:articleTitle	Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
pubmed:affiliation	Centre for Medical Education and Division of General Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't