Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-12-9
pubmed:abstractText
The importance of teams for improving quality of care has received increased attention. We examine both the correlates of self-assessed or perceived team effectiveness and its consequences for actually making changes to improve care for people with chronic illness. STUDY SETTING AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 40 teams participating in the national evaluation of the Improving Chronic Illness Care Program. Based on current theory and literature, measures were derived of organizational culture, a focus on patient satisfaction, presence of a team champion, team composition, perceived team effectiveness, and the actual number and depth of changes made to improve chronic illness care.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0025-7079
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
42
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1040-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-3-24
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care.
pubmed:affiliation
University of California, Berkeley 94720-7360, USA. shortell@uclink.berkeley.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Evaluation Studies