Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15509108
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
9
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-10-28
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The 2 main approaches to fracture plate fixation--compression plating and internal splinting--result in differing biomechanics and subsequent healing response patterns. A number of advantages to using the newer internal fixators have been described, but there are still several indications for traditional compression plating.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1078-4519
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
33
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
439-46
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-1-5
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Biomechanics,
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Bone Plates,
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Bone Screws,
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Fracture Fixation, Internal,
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Fracture Healing,
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Fractures, Bone,
pubmed-meshheading:15509108-Fractures, Comminuted
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Has locked plating completely replaced conventional plating?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York 10021, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|