Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
20
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-10-18
pubmed:abstractText
When an examination is needed to determine if an event has occurred there will be a loss of efficiency in using the resulting interval-censored data instead of the exact event times. In designing follow-up intervals this loss for longer intervals needs to be weighed against extra visits required by shorter intervals. We obtain results to quantify this for the estimation of the median and mean survival and for covariates in parametric regression models with equally spaced examination times. Asymptotic information loss for the log-normal and Weibull distributions are similar when comparisons are made between corresponding members of the two families. For distributions with coefficients of variation of 50 per cent or more, a choice of interval from 0.25 to 0.7 times the median is recommended.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0277-6715
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
30
pubmed:volume
23
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
3125-37
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Designing follow-up intervals.
pubmed:affiliation
School of Community Health, Napier University, Comely Bank, Edinburgh EH4 2LD, U.K. g.raab@napier.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't