Linked Life Data

15446477

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15446477

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-9-27
pubmed:abstractText
A pig growth assay was conducted to determine the relative biological value (RBV) of lysine from L-lysine sulfate compared with feed-grade L-lysine HCl. One hundred nursery pigs with an average initial BW of 9.5 +/- 1.5 kg were blocked by BW and gender and allotted randomly to five dietary treatments in five replicates of four pigs per pen. A corn-peanut meal diet containing 0.6% total lysine (as-fed basis) was supplemented with two levels (0.1 and 0.2%) of lysine from L-lysine-HCl or L-lysine sulfate. The RBV of L-lysine sulfate was determined using multiple regression slope-ratio methodology, with ADG and G:F as the response criteria. At the tested levels, linear responses for gain and G:F were obtained from increments of lysine from the two lysine sources. When ADG was regressed on supplemental lysine intake, the RBV of lysine in L-lysine sulfate was 99% of the RBV of lysine in L-lysine HCl. When G:F was regressed on supplemental lysine intake, the RBV of lysine in L-lysine sulfate was 97% of the RBV of lysine in L-lysine-HCl. The t-test analysis revealed that the RBV of lysine in L-lysine sulfate was not significantly different from the RBV of lysine in L-lysine HCl, which was assumed to be 100% bioavailable. In conclusion, L-lysine sulfate can replace L-lysine HCl in diets for growing swine.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0021-8812
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
82
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2610-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Bioefficacy of L-lysine sulfate compared with feed-grade L-lysine-HCl in young pigs.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article