rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0003881,
umls-concept:C0009566,
umls-concept:C0012634,
umls-concept:C0021815,
umls-concept:C0022417,
umls-concept:C0023866,
umls-concept:C0023981,
umls-concept:C0024090,
umls-concept:C0031119,
umls-concept:C0034656,
umls-concept:C0037949,
umls-concept:C0205155,
umls-concept:C0205210,
umls-concept:C0205494,
umls-concept:C0439849,
umls-concept:C0445223,
umls-concept:C0556656,
umls-concept:C0559956,
umls-concept:C1274040,
umls-concept:C1515022,
umls-concept:C1522472,
umls-concept:C1551341,
umls-concept:C1552599,
umls-concept:C1552858,
umls-concept:C1552923,
umls-concept:C1552924,
umls-concept:C1556138,
umls-concept:C1704787,
umls-concept:C1705191,
umls-concept:C1705370,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C2004457,
umls-concept:C2603343,
umls-concept:C2826366
|
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-9-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Arthrodesis is the gold standard for surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Solid fusion, however, can cause stress and increased motion in the segments adjacent to the fused level. This may initiate and/or accelerate the adjacent-segment disease process. Artificial discs are designed to restore and maintain normal motion of the lumbar intervertebral segment. Restoring and maintaining normal motion of the segment reduces stresses and loads on adjacent level segments. A US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemptions multicentered study of the Charité artificial disc was completed. The control group consisted of individuals who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion involving BAK cages and iliac crest bone graft. This is the first report of Class I data in which a lumbar artificial disc is compared with lumbar fusion.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1547-5654
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
1
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
143-54
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Biomechanics,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Disability Evaluation,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Diskectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Hypesthesia,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Joint Prosthesis,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Lumbar Vertebrae,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Pain Measurement,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Paresthesia,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Patient Satisfaction,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Postoperative Complications,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Prosthesis Design,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Range of Motion, Articular,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Reflex,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Spinal Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Spinal Fusion,
pubmed-meshheading:15346999-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Illinois Neuro-Spine Center at Rush-Copley Medical Center, Aurora, Illinois 60504, USA. fgeisler@concentric.net
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Multicenter Study
|