Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9436
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-8-31
pubmed:abstractText
A proposed nationwide postal questionnaire to Swedish parents who had lost a child due to cancer between 1992 and 1997 was denied approval by the local ethics committee. However, a pilot study to assess the harm and benefit of the questionnaire was approved. 95% of parents found the pilot study valuable; thus, we were allowed to proceed with the main study, which consisted of 129 questions about the child's care and death and five about the parents' perceptions of the study. 423 (99%) parents found the investigation valuable, 285 (68%) were positively affected, and 123 (28%) were negatively affected (10 [2%] of whom, very much). Although the numerical data cannot be directly translated to ethical conclusions, they can provide guidance for future ethical decisions.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1474-547X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
364
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
787-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
A population-based nationwide study of parents' perceptions of a questionnaire on their child's death due to cancer.
pubmed:affiliation
Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Z6:01 Karolinska Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't