Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-8-16
pubmed:abstractText
Methods for systematic reviews are well developed for trials, but not for non-experimental or qualitative research. This paper describes the methods developed for reviewing research on people's perspectives and experiences ("views" studies) alongside trials within a series of reviews on young people's mental health, physical activity, and healthy eating. Reports of views studies were difficult to locate; could not easily be classified as "qualitative" or "quantitative"; and often failed to meet seven basic methodological reporting standards used in a newly developed quality assessment tool. Synthesising views studies required the adaptation of qualitative analysis techniques. The benefits of bringing together views studies in a systematic way included gaining a greater breadth of perspectives and a deeper understanding of public health issues from the point of view of those targeted by interventions. A systematic approach also aided reflection on study methods that may distort, misrepresent, or fail to pick up people's views. This methodology is likely to create greater opportunities for people's own perspectives and experiences to inform policies to promote their health.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-10374081, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-10558335, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-10947480, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-11115138, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-11431306, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-11440947, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-11489038, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-11746058, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-12511463, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-12560003, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-3035126, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-7613363, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-8773637, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/15310807-9238586
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0143-005X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
58
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
794-800
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research.
pubmed:affiliation
Social Science Research Unit, 18 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0NS, UK. a.harden@ioe.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't