15217769

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15217769

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0015733, umls-concept:C0022885, umls-concept:C0023117, umls-concept:C0028792, umls-concept:C0039593, umls-concept:C1707455
pubmed:issue	3
pubmed:dateCreated	2004-6-25
pubmed:abstractText	Occult blood detection is the most prescribed faecal examination.
pubmed:language	fre
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/2984690R
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:issn	0003-3898
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:BardonJJ, pubmed-author:GobertJ-GJG, pubmed-author:KapelNN
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	62
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	339-43
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:15217769-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15217769-Immunologic Tests, pubmed-meshheading:15217769-Latex Fixation Tests, pubmed-meshheading:15217769-Occult Blood, pubmed-meshheading:15217769-Prospective Studies
pubmed:articleTitle	[Faecal occult blood testing: comparison of a latex agglutination test (Hemolex) and an immunoturbidimetric test (QuikRead FOB)].
pubmed:affiliation	Laboratoire de coprologie fonctionnelle, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract