Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15194912rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1557561lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1322793lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243032lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1551055lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527362lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:dateCreated2004-6-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:abstractTextThis study evaluated different stent grafts by 3 T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with respect to lumen visibility, susceptibility-induced signal loss, and type of stent artifacts compared with 1.5 T MRA in a phantom model.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:issn0020-9996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeindelWalter...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaintzDavidDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KugelHaraldHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KrämerStefan...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BachmannRaina...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WallAlexander...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:volume39lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:pagination413-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15194912...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15194912...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15194912...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15194912...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15194912...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:articleTitle3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography of endovascular aortic stent grafts: phantom measurements in comparison with 1.5 Tesla.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:affiliationInstitut fur Klinische Radiologie, Rontgendiagnostik, Universitatsklinikum, Munster, Germany. kraemers@uni-muenster.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15194912pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed