Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15194912
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
7
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-6-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This study evaluated different stent grafts by 3 T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with respect to lumen visibility, susceptibility-induced signal loss, and type of stent artifacts compared with 1.5 T MRA in a phantom model.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0020-9996
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
39
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
413-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography of endovascular aortic stent grafts: phantom measurements in comparison with 1.5 Tesla.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Institut fur Klinische Radiologie, Rontgendiagnostik, Universitatsklinikum, Munster, Germany. kraemers@uni-muenster.de
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|