Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15184835
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-6-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The abundance of evidence supporting beta-blocker therapy has resulted in the widespread acceptance of these drugs in the treatment of heart-failure patients. However, beta-blockers are not a homogeneous class of drugs, and important differences in efficacy have been noted between different members of the class. Thus, practicing physicians are faced with a choice when selecting a particular beta-blocker for treating heart failure. One of the considerations is whether to choose a selective or a nonselective beta-blocker. The results of the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial indicate that carvedilol, a third-generation, nonselective beta-blocker with additional a-blocking, antioxidant, and other properties, is clearly superior to a beta1-blocking drug, metoprolol tartrate. The choice between these drugs is therefore unambiguously in favor of carvedilol.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1530-6550
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
5 Suppl 1
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
S10-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Nonselective versus selective beta-blockers in the management of chronic heart failure: clinical implications of the carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Heart Failure/Cardiac Transplantation Program, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|