Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15159619
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-6-18
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Large randomised trials performed in the 1980s and early 1990s showed that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is beneficial for patients with recently symptomatic severe stenosis. Some surgeons have argued that the operative risk of stroke and death has fallen over the last decade due to refinements in operative technique, and that the indications for surgery should therefore now be broadened. Yet, studies of routinely collected data report higher operative mortality than in the trials, and surgical case series without independent post-operative assessment by a neurologist may not provide reliable data on stroke risk.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1015-9770
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
18
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
37-46
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Time trends in the published risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Meta-Analysis
|