Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-4-27
pubmed:abstractText
A prospective randomised phase III study in patients < or =65 years old with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM), intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell rescue was compared with intensive chemotherapy alone. This economic evaluation was based on detailed data from patient charts and hospital information systems. In the intention-to-treat analysis, mean total treatment and follow-up costs of the myeloablative treatment arm were 81,643 euros compared to 68,802 euros for the chemotherapy arm (P=0.09). Costs per quality-adjusted life year were 51,357 euros versus 37,328 euros. In the clinical study, no significant differences were found in overall survival after a median follow-up of 33 months from randomisation. Intensive chemotherapy is regarded as standard therapy for younger patients with previously untreated MM. Cost-effectiveness of myeloma therapy after 3 years of follow up seems not to be favoured by myeloablative treatment with autologous stem-cell rescue.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0959-8049
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
40
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1159-69
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
A cost-utility analysis comparing intensive chemotherapy alone to intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in newly diagnosed patients with stage II/III multiple myeloma; a prospective randomised phase III study.
pubmed:affiliation
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus MC, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vanagthoven@bmg.eur.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study, Clinical Trial, Phase III